This site is for Jobs in iraq , what ever job you want is here you can find it here in this site http://www.gulfjobster.com/
this is great site I foun it today it contain daily Jobs inBaghdad Gulf and all arabic world
See more from the site on jobs from here http://www.gulfjobster.com/
.
http://mosul-4all.blogspot.com/
Thursday, July 31, 2008
Terrorism in iraq
The president of Iraq has told the president of Iran to stop funding and sponsoring the insurgency in Iraq. Recently, RPG 29s with armored piercing rounds were found in Iraq in the hands of insurgents. These RPG 29s are manufactured in Iran and so we know where they came from. The president of Iraq has told the president of Iran if this does not cease and desist immediately that Iraq will respond in kind. What does this mean?
It means in Iraq realizes it cannot stop the insurgency because it is being sponsored by a nation-state of Iran, which has a million man army. It also means that if Iran does not stop them, then Iraq will send insurgents into Iran since international terrorism seems to be a weapon of choice in the Middle East and Iraq is getting sick of having its people and innocent women and children slaughtered.
Should Iraq be allowed to use insurgency and international terrorism to defeat international terrorism? Does an eye for an eye still hold true? These are tough questions to answer, but if you were in the president of Iraq's shoes what would you do? Some tough choices have to be made and it appears they may be in the near future.
http://mosul-4all.blogspot.com/
It means in Iraq realizes it cannot stop the insurgency because it is being sponsored by a nation-state of Iran, which has a million man army. It also means that if Iran does not stop them, then Iraq will send insurgents into Iran since international terrorism seems to be a weapon of choice in the Middle East and Iraq is getting sick of having its people and innocent women and children slaughtered.
Should Iraq be allowed to use insurgency and international terrorism to defeat international terrorism? Does an eye for an eye still hold true? These are tough questions to answer, but if you were in the president of Iraq's shoes what would you do? Some tough choices have to be made and it appears they may be in the near future.
http://mosul-4all.blogspot.com/
Iraq War What Is The Price?
The war situations in Iraq are getting worse day by day. The Democrat’s support for the war to continue means that it will stagger forward in anticipation of the mission getting collapsed.
Today Iraq is no longer called a unified country.
2 million Iraqis have been forced to take shelter elsewhere as their home have turned to ashes. Equal number of people fled from the country. Countries like Jordan have maximum number of refugees there.
A report says that every one out of three Iraqis needs emergency aid badly, but the war and aggression is so widespread that medical aid is impossible. Iraq is in a state of anarchy. The American chaos has forced people to take bad against US troops as well. Everyday many soldiers get killed in Iraq.
It was not thought to be like this. Do you remember all visions of a democratic Iraq? Politicians had assured us that the combat would be a cakewalk.
Democracy would be enforced in the Iraq. Now, struggling to save their own trustworthiness, they charge the disaster because of poor planning and management.
Iraq was full of oil resources. The disaster had led this country to a situation where it can hardly supply its resources to any other country. The victory over Iraq has resulted only violence, poverty, terrorism, and lots of other things. Such a situation has forced Iraq to struggle with the poverty, poor economy, and terrorism for next a few couple of years.
Was this victory worth it?
Today Iraq is no longer called a unified country.
2 million Iraqis have been forced to take shelter elsewhere as their home have turned to ashes. Equal number of people fled from the country. Countries like Jordan have maximum number of refugees there.
A report says that every one out of three Iraqis needs emergency aid badly, but the war and aggression is so widespread that medical aid is impossible. Iraq is in a state of anarchy. The American chaos has forced people to take bad against US troops as well. Everyday many soldiers get killed in Iraq.
It was not thought to be like this. Do you remember all visions of a democratic Iraq? Politicians had assured us that the combat would be a cakewalk.
Democracy would be enforced in the Iraq. Now, struggling to save their own trustworthiness, they charge the disaster because of poor planning and management.
Iraq was full of oil resources. The disaster had led this country to a situation where it can hardly supply its resources to any other country. The victory over Iraq has resulted only violence, poverty, terrorism, and lots of other things. Such a situation has forced Iraq to struggle with the poverty, poor economy, and terrorism for next a few couple of years.
Was this victory worth it?
Saturday, July 26, 2008
Learning xhtml language
Yesterday I wanted to learn xhtml language to make my own template and to make sure where I will but my google adsense advertise and I learn the bacis of this great language, and I learned that Microsofe Frontppage work with xhtml.
I wonder if there is a website learn us how make sure that the template we make is correctly work .
there is good sites that have beta templates such as www.btemplates.com .It is very good site that contain too many templates fit on any blogger beta site.
http://mosul-4all.blogspot.com/
I wonder if there is a website learn us how make sure that the template we make is correctly work .
there is good sites that have beta templates such as www.btemplates.com .It is very good site that contain too many templates fit on any blogger beta site.
http://mosul-4all.blogspot.com/
Friday, July 25, 2008
Iraq Olympic official says talks started on ban
BAGHDAD (AP)—The spokesman for the banned Iraqi Olympic Committee says he still hopes that Iraq can take part in next month’s Beijing games.
Jazair al-Sahlani says that talks are under way Friday to restore Iraq’s Olympic status and he hopes a settlement could be reached early next week. The International Olympic Committee on Thursday upheld its ban on Iraq for political inference in Olympic affairs.
In June, the Iraqi government disbanded its Olympic Committee and replaced it with new members not recognized by the IOC. Iraq planned to send seven athletes to Beijing.
Al-Sahlani says that Germany and China are involved in the talks, but gave no other details.
Thursday, July 24, 2008
McCain's confusion on Iraq
McCain's confusion on Iraq
If there is any fixed position in John McCain's policy agenda, it's that we must never, ever, set a timetable for leaving Iraq. He regularly flogs Barack Obama for proposing to withdraw by the summer of 2010. So it was a surprise to hear him say Monday, when asked if our troops might depart in the next two years, "Oh, I think they could be largely withdrawn, as I've said."
I guess that makes it unanimous. This week, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said he's amenable to bidding the U.S. goodbye on Obama's schedule. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown indicated his forces also will be heading home soon. Even President Bush has now come around to establishing a "time horizon" for "the further reduction of U.S. combat forces from Iraq." In other words: "We're going to leave, but it's none of your business when."
Despite creeping toward withdrawal himself, McCain continues to lambaste Obama for setting a timetable. But if the current policy is the stunning success depicted by McCain, it should be eminently practical to turn Iraq over to the Iraqis by the middle of 2010. If it is impossible to do that, more than seven years after the occupation began, how can McCain say the existing strategy is working?
The Arizona senator sounded frustrated this week, insisting that Obama was "completely wrong" in opposing the Bush administration's escalation of the war in January 2007. "The fact is, if we had done what Sen. Obama wanted to do, we would have lost," he declared."And we would have faced a wider war.
And we would have had greater problems in Afghanistan and the entire region." What McCain omits is that if he himself had been right all the times before 2007 that he said things were going fine, no surge would have been needed. He's like a weatherman who forecasts clear skies every day and, when the rain finally lets up after a week, expects a standing ovation for his accuracy.If we had done what Obama wanted to do back in 2002, we would not have lost—because we would not have invaded Iraq to start with.
We would not have suffered 4,100 dead and 30,000 wounded or burned through hundreds of billions of dollars.We also would not have diverted ourselves from the correct focus of the war on terrorism. "Greater problems in Afghanistan and the entire region"? Apparently McCain hasn't noticed that we got those in spite of the surge, or more likely because of it.The troop escalation has not been the complete failure Obama suggested it would be, but it has fallen far short of the triumph claimed by Republicans.
The level of violence, though down from the very worst months of the war, remains at levels comparable with 2005, which were considered awful at the time. Iraqi civilians died at a higher rate in the first four months of this year than in the same period of 2005. The number of attacks on U.S. and Iraqi forces is about the same. Here is McCain's definition of success: returning to a pace of bloodshed that was once regarded as intolerable. Even the progress made in the last 18 months is only partly attributable to the additional American forces. Equally important was the decision of Sunni militias to turn against Al Qaeda in Iraq.
McCain insists this shift was only made possible by the surge—when, in fact, it happened several months before. Does he not know what really happened? Or does he not care?Also contributing to the decline in sectarian violence was that by 2007, it already had achieved its main goal: driving Sunnis out of Shiite neighborhoods and vice versa. Of the 5 million Iraqis who fled their homes in the last five years, only 30,000 have returned. The refugee crisis is just one of the results of a war that McCain has supported all along.
The surge didn't provide a remedy to that or the many other afflictions that plague Iraq. For good or ill, though, we have probably achieved about all we can with the means available. That's obvious to most Americans and most Iraqis. Once in a while, the realization even dawns on John McCain. But he lies down until it passes.Steve Chapman is a member of the Tribune's editorial board.
http://mosul-4all.blogspot.com/
source : http://www.chicagotribune.com ttp://mosulhttp://mosul-4all.blogspot.com/-4all.blogspot.com/
http://mosul-4all.blogspot.com/
If there is any fixed position in John McCain's policy agenda, it's that we must never, ever, set a timetable for leaving Iraq. He regularly flogs Barack Obama for proposing to withdraw by the summer of 2010. So it was a surprise to hear him say Monday, when asked if our troops might depart in the next two years, "Oh, I think they could be largely withdrawn, as I've said."
I guess that makes it unanimous. This week, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said he's amenable to bidding the U.S. goodbye on Obama's schedule. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown indicated his forces also will be heading home soon. Even President Bush has now come around to establishing a "time horizon" for "the further reduction of U.S. combat forces from Iraq." In other words: "We're going to leave, but it's none of your business when."
Despite creeping toward withdrawal himself, McCain continues to lambaste Obama for setting a timetable. But if the current policy is the stunning success depicted by McCain, it should be eminently practical to turn Iraq over to the Iraqis by the middle of 2010. If it is impossible to do that, more than seven years after the occupation began, how can McCain say the existing strategy is working?
The Arizona senator sounded frustrated this week, insisting that Obama was "completely wrong" in opposing the Bush administration's escalation of the war in January 2007. "The fact is, if we had done what Sen. Obama wanted to do, we would have lost," he declared."And we would have faced a wider war.
And we would have had greater problems in Afghanistan and the entire region." What McCain omits is that if he himself had been right all the times before 2007 that he said things were going fine, no surge would have been needed. He's like a weatherman who forecasts clear skies every day and, when the rain finally lets up after a week, expects a standing ovation for his accuracy.If we had done what Obama wanted to do back in 2002, we would not have lost—because we would not have invaded Iraq to start with.
We would not have suffered 4,100 dead and 30,000 wounded or burned through hundreds of billions of dollars.We also would not have diverted ourselves from the correct focus of the war on terrorism. "Greater problems in Afghanistan and the entire region"? Apparently McCain hasn't noticed that we got those in spite of the surge, or more likely because of it.The troop escalation has not been the complete failure Obama suggested it would be, but it has fallen far short of the triumph claimed by Republicans.
The level of violence, though down from the very worst months of the war, remains at levels comparable with 2005, which were considered awful at the time. Iraqi civilians died at a higher rate in the first four months of this year than in the same period of 2005. The number of attacks on U.S. and Iraqi forces is about the same. Here is McCain's definition of success: returning to a pace of bloodshed that was once regarded as intolerable. Even the progress made in the last 18 months is only partly attributable to the additional American forces. Equally important was the decision of Sunni militias to turn against Al Qaeda in Iraq.
McCain insists this shift was only made possible by the surge—when, in fact, it happened several months before. Does he not know what really happened? Or does he not care?Also contributing to the decline in sectarian violence was that by 2007, it already had achieved its main goal: driving Sunnis out of Shiite neighborhoods and vice versa. Of the 5 million Iraqis who fled their homes in the last five years, only 30,000 have returned. The refugee crisis is just one of the results of a war that McCain has supported all along.
The surge didn't provide a remedy to that or the many other afflictions that plague Iraq. For good or ill, though, we have probably achieved about all we can with the means available. That's obvious to most Americans and most Iraqis. Once in a while, the realization even dawns on John McCain. But he lies down until it passes.Steve Chapman is a member of the Tribune's editorial board.
http://mosul-4all.blogspot.com/
source : http://www.chicagotribune.com ttp://mosulhttp://mosul-4all.blogspot.com/-4all.blogspot.com/
http://mosul-4all.blogspot.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
